Skip to main content

The Medical Paradigm(s)

Image
By
Modern medicine is built around the concept that was developed during the last century for treating acute illness. This paradigm (theoretical framework) evolved after the invention of penicillin (and as a product of the industrial revolution) and grew exponentially into a giant industry which has been remarkably successful (and often miraculous). The fundamental principle which drives this paradigm is that acute body illness can be cured with a medicine, procedure (surgery, radiation, or physical manipulation). This paradigm applies to standard medicine and also to many of the "alternative/complementary" approaches such as chiropractic care, massage or even acupuncture. You come in injured, sick or wounded (body) and we (the medical industrial complex) can fix you.

Great. Spectacular. God are we lucky to be alive during this time of remarkable capacity. It is truly awesome how widespread and disseminated the knowledge and power of this paradigm is in a remarkably short period of time (about 70-80 years).

The challenge now is to continue to develop, disseminate and perfect this framework for the treatment of acute body disability while recognizing that this paradigm is NOT the answer for chronic suffering and illness. The modern medical machine wants so much to use its miraculous tools to fix this entirely different entity. However, chronic illness is not anything like acute illness. They are completely different animals. The miracles of modern medicine do not cure, fix or even truly address the challenges of chronic disease.

This is where a new paradigm has to evolve. Of course, a new paradigm is necessary; the problem is completely different. We have to start from scratch and first define this other entity (chronic disease/suffering) and then build an entirely new paradigm to address it.

Comments

Michael McCafferty said…
It is very good to know the difference between acute and chronic disease; something I had not considered before your teaching me about this.

However, doesn't current medical practice still try to address chronic illness/pain with the standard tools of the trade (pills, surgery, etc)?

Or, does the medical doctor, who, upon recognizing a chronic condition simply say "Modern medicine can not help you. Go home and continue to suffer." ?
October 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM
Judy said…
I enjoyed this post so much that I linked to it in my post today.

http://lapazconvos.blogspot.com/2011/12/chronic-versus-acute-illness.html

Judy
December 4, 2011 at 9:08 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

IT'S HAPPENING

By
Wow, the information available on CCSVI on the internet is truly amazing! I have to admit: I did not research this topic as well as I could have. I did not read the study from Poland before my procedure. I did not realize all the excitement combined with incredible knowledge that is coming out of Georgetown. I am just reading them now and I can hardly contain myself. There is so much data available on CCSVI from around the world. I acted more on a deep gut feeling that CCSVI was real and was my path to healing. I was a little desperate as I felt myself sliding over the last year and didn't feel right with the auto-immune drugs. CCSVI just made sense to me; really good sense. Now reading the data, I am so excited for huge numbers of people to get healed/opened/freed! After doing a little research, it seems that nearly all people with definite MS have CCSVI. It also seems that people with MS who have the procedure have less flairs over time and a better quality of life. Some get a lo...
6 comments
Read more

The Future of Primary Care (and the Future is Now)

By
What do people need from their primary care doctor/practice? These are our goals at Pando: To deliver all of these  with a kind heart .         (1) Rapid access               a. In person when necessary               b. Via phone or email on an ongoing basis         (2) Diagnosis, Treatment and Monitoring of acute and chronic problems with the current  BEST  practices         (3) Close Follow-up after acute illnesses, ER visits; referral to superior specialty care when needed         (4) Preventive Care               a. Prophylactic Medicines, Screening Tests (Mammograms, Colonoscopy)               b. Lifestyle Advice, Behavior Change Advice and Guidance with follow-up support         (5) Meeting of non-medical needs ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Placebo

By
Someone recently asked me in response to my blog as well as to the success of the Liberation Procedure, "Is it just placebo effect"? This is truly a loaded question. After my initial defensive reaction, I gave it deeper thought. Placebo is truly a giant word and concept. It has negative connotations("he is just better because of the placebo effect") but it has immense power and strength. In research studies, experimenters often compare a new treatment with a placebo. In order for the treatment to be accepted, a new therapy has to be better than placebo. In most studies placebo does remarkably well ie 30-40% benefit. So 30-40 per cent of people get better with a sugar pill or an inert substance. This speaks strongly about several points. First, approximately one third of people get better with no intervention with placebo or time or just believing that they will get better. This has enormous power. Harnessing the power of this safe intervention can be amazingly hea...
5 comments
Read more