Skip to main content

A New Paradigm for Chronic Disease

Chronic disease is an entirely different entity than acute illness or disability. The key differentiating point is that chronic disease becomes "entangled" in a tornado of "host factors" complicating the body manifestation of the problem. It is these host factors that make it (1) more difficult to eradicate with the miracles of modern technology and pharmacology and (2) require an entirely different theoretical framework (paradigm) to approach and cure. It is possible to cure or significantly improve chronic disease but the approach is entirely different.

While acute illness (ie infection) can be eradicated with implementation of a correct antibiotic or a diseased appendix can be cured with surgical removal, chronic conditions (those present for over 3-6 months) require a much broader, more holistic, deeper investigation and approach. The reason for this requirement is that when a problem becomes entrenched in a body, it becomes enmeshed with the host in a variety of ways that is often unique to the host's individual's styles and patterns for living but is also a universal reaction to distress and system upset.

The host factors which complicate the quandry of chronic disease include: lifestyle routine (habits), emotions and feelings, core beliefs (which may not be consciously known to the individual), perceived and true support system, knowledge of one's condition, access to care (medical, psychological and spiritual), self-esteem and self-efficacy, internal sense of spirituality and connection to the world and one's support system, and the capacity to be open and vulnerable.

This is a daunting list and exactly the reason that modern medicine is struggling both financially and in regard to successfully managing this enormous and pervasive entity. Modern medicine is still aggressively trying to care for chronic disease with the acute disease paradigm. Modern medicine is successful at managing acute illness; it is however, overmatched and overwhelmed with the task of managing, conceivably curing or at least controlling the world of chronic disease and disability. It is for this reason that a new paradigm is absolutely required and must be developed soon before our world is overrun with its magnitude and scope.

The first step in tackling this giant "elephant in the room" is to acknowledge that we have to have a new approach. We must accept that our current framework (applying the principles and miracles of acute care medicine to chronic disease) does not work and must be changed.

The second step is to recognize that healing chronic illness involves healing ourselves and not necessarily being healed by a "quick" solution such as a medicine or procedure. Thus, a deep look into who we are, how we feel about ourselves, how we express ourselves, how we live, what we believe, who we count on and confide in, and how we relate to our world ALL matter.

Next, realizing that all these critical "host" factors can be changed, updated and made more healthful and health-promoting is at the core of healing. We cannot continue to live the same life if we want different results.

Of course, the mechanism to allow each of us as individuals and all of us as a society and world to accomplish such seemingly enormous change must be developed, implemented and disseminated. While the task seems daunting, it really is not. The path to change comes out of human relationship. We cannot change unless we open ourselves to new perspectives and new perspectives evolve out of connection with our fellow humans.

Now, trying to change concretized ways of being does not happen in the current model of modern medicine -- brief, focused interactions with healthcare providers who are over-taxed and struggling to manage their own overwhelming "plates". Change evolves out of a nurturing, safe space where one feels comfortable to reveal who they really are and what prevents them from being who they want to be. First and foremost, this requires time. Second, it requires a sense of peace and and calm and acceptance. Third, it requires wisdom; a wisdom that does not necessarily come from a brilliant authority figure but a wisdom that comes from a group of human-beings who are working on a common goal (healing heart disease or managing aging or curing chronic pain).

Thus, the new paradigm for healing chronic illness is a group setting with individuals with a common condition or situation led by an open individual or ideally by two (or more) individuals with complementary strengths and skills.

Models for this approach have been in existence for eons. AA has been a gateway to help millions of people locked in the grip of alcololism. The Dean Ornish program for Reversing Heart Disease demonstrated to the world that heart disease (the number one killer of Americans) can be reversed and transcended with a comprehensive, holistic, loving, connecting approach which involves yoga, healthy eating, daily exercise and a group process. These are only 2 examples of successful (although not perfect) programs that can lead people back to health. They both provide a group process, a spiritual path and a communal movement and commitment toward healing.

This philosophy and style is ready to be available to all the world that wants and needs to heal. Let's start the conversation(s) -- we are ready.


Comments

This is an excellent post. I'm really getting clear on why the paradigm of medicine needs to change. Or, rather, that there are two kinds of healing, one for acute medical conditions, and one for "other" or chronic conditions.

So then, what is the first step to healing for a person with chronic condition(s)? What is the overall plan? Where can one find these groups you mention?

Popular posts from this blog

IT'S HAPPENING

Wow, the information available on CCSVI on the internet is truly amazing! I have to admit: I did not research this topic as well as I could have. I did not read the study from Poland before my procedure. I did not realize all the excitement combined with incredible knowledge that is coming out of Georgetown. I am just reading them now and I can hardly contain myself. There is so much data available on CCSVI from around the world. I acted more on a deep gut feeling that CCSVI was real and was my path to healing. I was a little desperate as I felt myself sliding over the last year and didn't feel right with the auto-immune drugs. CCSVI just made sense to me; really good sense. Now reading the data, I am so excited for huge numbers of people to get healed/opened/freed! After doing a little research, it seems that nearly all people with definite MS have CCSVI. It also seems that people with MS who have the procedure have less flairs over time and a better quality of life. Some get a lo...

The Future of Primary Care (and the Future is Now)

What do people need from their primary care doctor/practice? These are our goals at Pando: To deliver all of these  with a kind heart .         (1) Rapid access               a. In person when necessary               b. Via phone or email on an ongoing basis         (2) Diagnosis, Treatment and Monitoring of acute and chronic problems with the current  BEST  practices         (3) Close Follow-up after acute illnesses, ER visits; referral to superior specialty care when needed         (4) Preventive Care               a. Prophylactic Medicines, Screening Tests (Mammograms, Colonoscopy)               b. Lifestyle Advice, Behavior Change Advice and Guidance with follow-up support         (5) Meeting of non-medical needs ...

Placebo

Someone recently asked me in response to my blog as well as to the success of the Liberation Procedure, "Is it just placebo effect"? This is truly a loaded question. After my initial defensive reaction, I gave it deeper thought. Placebo is truly a giant word and concept. It has negative connotations("he is just better because of the placebo effect") but it has immense power and strength. In research studies, experimenters often compare a new treatment with a placebo. In order for the treatment to be accepted, a new therapy has to be better than placebo. In most studies placebo does remarkably well ie 30-40% benefit. So 30-40 per cent of people get better with a sugar pill or an inert substance. This speaks strongly about several points. First, approximately one third of people get better with no intervention with placebo or time or just believing that they will get better. This has enormous power. Harnessing the power of this safe intervention can be amazingly hea...